Another product enters the market in lines of senuke x. Iam starting to think that it is easy to develop and i should make one of my own 
. Anyways i will get to the point – Ultimate Demon is the next in line product by Edwin and iam a huge fan of bookmarking demon but this one right out blows….
Ultimate Demon Overview :
1) Just like it’s competitors, it supports multiple backlink profiles like web 2.0, press releases, social bookmarks, article directories etc.
2) Captcha services included and it is also multi-threaded
3) You can add your own websites (i didn’t try because i didn’t know how to)
4) This is the only one which has scheduler and other features like pinger.
5) No slow browser windows. It supports sockets like latest senuke x and is quite fast.
Weak Points of Ultimate Demon :
1) Only 12 web2.0 properties. Serious drawback since their power is amazing.
2) The GUI should be worked upon. Everything opens in a new window and it is not easy for even someone like me to figure out what lies where.
3) Wrong advertising of one-time payment or fees. Developers have been using this tactic quite a lot lately. And just like SE-Robot, i wouldn’t recommend paying $400 at once for anything other than senuke or xrumer.
4) In just a basic run i got only 4 successful results in web2.0. I didn’t even try anything else. Very disappointing.
5) Just like any other of his software, Ultimate Demon can be run on single PC only. Huh? Senuke can be run on 3 at a time.
6) No forums for backlinks. Not that important but still.
Where I’am Going Wrong :
You cannot ask Muhammad Ali to box with a kid. Remember that senukex is a product of months in development and s full-fledged team working after it day and night. This is just the first release of Ultimate Demon and we will have to give it time rather than start writing that “Why it sucks”.
Note to developers – Before releasing your product, make sure you test it thoroughly. Hire beta-testers. You can get them for free on any forum. You won’t even have to pay them anything. But please don’t use customers for beta-testing. It will kill your market.
Final Verdict : Don’t waste your money thinking about how much you are saving. It cannot be compared to anything right now and is miles away from being a full-fledged software. With time maybe it will reach a satisfactory point but right now it is not even close.
Yeah the WEB2 creation sucks (as does Magic Submitters) The GUI is not in the same excellent style as the other Demon products either (Why? you get used to something then they go and change it for no good reason)
But measuring this tool on WEB2 only is not really doing it justice.
Automated tools for web2 SUCK..All of them..
NukeX included.
Why?
Not becasue some don’t create the sites…but because one or two post WEB2 sites offer next to no SEO benefit what-so-ever.
Sure in 2009 this system worked.
In fact it rocked.
In 2010 it started to get a kicking by Google (and don’t expect any organic taffic from these “trash” sites).
From 2011 onwards quick 1-2 post WEB 2 sites are either deleted (and WordPress.com deletes over 1 MILLION sites amonth alone) or – if they do stay up, they are ignored for SEO benefit until they have serious age and post count of unique content.
This situation is only going to get worse!
Next price. UD costs less than a third of NukeX per month
There is no “one-off payment” for NUke X any more – so no point comparing the $397 with anything – just the $47 per month compared with $147 per month.
UD offers all the features of previous Demon productds as one product with some limited WEB2 creation thrown in. Edwin supports his products (BMD is now 6 years old and was last updated arounf 17th December…11 days ago)
If you don’t use Captchas this is free (All demon products have captcha affiliation..this is how the upkeep is paid for)
Other fuctionality? Although AMR offers better results (slightly), BMD is a breeze to use and add sites to, no artificial limits (I think 650 is about the most new sites you can add to AMR – my article demon has about 22,000 sites on it, all loaded and sorted in one go (it took the software about 2 hours mind you – but I was doing something else while that was going on).
AD with something like scrapebox (to find all the sites you can add), some captchas and some proxies and a little time is all most people will need to get some pretty special results.
I budget that as $500 now, then say $50 a month for the captchas and proxies – for most that will be all they ever need
UD is rough, and it could do with more WEB2 (even just for link obfuscation purposes) but it costs less than a third of NukeX, less than Magic Submitter.
Magic submitter – whose mantra is “It’s not broken – cause we let you fix it yourself..for free” which for a subscription pruduct is a really bad attitude for those of us who just want to get on and post and not spend all day refixing the basic sites.
At the moment NukexX IS better, even at the price point – BUT for those on a budget, and for those buying after Edwin soft update the product (which they will, they always do) UD will offer a real and far cheaper alternative.
As for WEB2…make your own 15-20 post sites. Yeah it takes time – but in anything longer than the shortest of short terms, it’s the only way that actually works. Spending hours on making hundreds of one post trash site that are either deleted or ignored is a complete waste of time regardless of how easy it is..it’s not 2009 any more folks.
Scritty
Scritty weighing in – seriously you own stock in EdwinSoft, don’t you? I’ve learned a ton from your BMD posts on the forum (now forgetting which – BHW?), gotta respect your opinion.
But you’re wrong about AMR – my copy has over 9k sites and you can add a ton more than 650 sites to its database. Not sure where you got your info from on that account, I can still add more.
What I don’t like about BMD or any EdwinSoft product is the submission engine. Please kill me. I mean really: unless you’re paying for a VPS or have an expendable quad-core lying around with the world’s best ISP (cable or better yet: a T-1), they SUCK at submission speeds.
BMD at $147 was the worst money I’ve spent, even after reading your tuts. So when UD came out and offered a 1-time payment for “all their software” and then some packaged in one tool…I had to laugh.
No freaking thanks.
As far as web 2 creation – again, not sure what sites you’re submitting to, but I’ve moved up some serious rankings from just 5 manually-submitted posts to a web 2.
It’s not 2009, you’re right – but hell, those links were made 3 weeks ago. They work just fine (manually created, mind you: not spun and deleted).
Other than that, hat’s off to you if you use EdwinSoft’s products like a boss. I just never put the mindless hours into the headache necessary to get them working right (VPS, dedicated PC for submission, etc.). Those costs are never included, which makes all their products incredibly expensive.
It’s cheaper in my case to have subscription services to places like BMR, ALN, ArticleRanks and the like: no headaches, no PC issues of taking up too many resources, no worries about proxies and scraping and scrubbing my own lists…
Yikes. I’d like my life back: so paying for either outsourcers or subscription services, on top of AMR and other desktop submitters that don’t eat up all your CPU resources: that’s decided the case.
Hey
I know that i use his tools a lot but this one sucks (actually got an upgrade email and iam about to re-write the review). Also BMD can be run at a vps costing $8 only from burst.net (see their budget vps plans). IMO it’s not that resource savy. Also yeah i should correct that AMR post lol.
I didn’t mean web2.0 completely suck, i meant that through UD it is not that powerful like senuke or others. Regarding ALN and BMR they are very powerful networks. I use ALN regularly and it has given me some very nice rankings indeed. And manual SEO FTW. I have studies backlinks of so many competitors and no one has shitty spun content pointing at them.